THE ARAB VIEW OF ZIONISM -1900-1920 - The British Steals The Legal Jewish Territory in Jordan - YJ Draiman
THE ARAB VIEW OF ZIONISM -1900-1920
During all the period that the Zionists had been without benefit of
Balfour Declaration or Mandatory 'assistance the
attitude of the Arabs toward the Jewish National Movement had been one of
almost unanimous approval. In 1906, Farid Kassab, famous Syrian author, had
expressed the view uniformly held by Arabs: "The Jews of the Orient are at
home. This land is their only fatherland. They
don't know any other." 28 A year later Dr. Gaster reported that he had
"held conversations with some of the leading sheikhs, and they all
expressed themselves as very pleased with the advent of the Jews, for they
considered that with them had come barakat, i.e., blessing, since the rain came
in due season." 29
– Read the full article in the link below.
(Excerpt
from – The Rape of Palestine by William Ziff)
The British Steals The Legal Jewish
Territory in Jordan
No part of this
discourages Whitehall from broadcasting the usual paean in 1936 to the beauties
of existence in this "peaceful and contented country, blessed with an Arab
Emir and Government, and being without a Jewish problem" 9 Calmly shifting
gears a few short months later, it acknowledges that "the Emirate of
Abdullah is poor, miserably poor, but it does not want the wealth of the
Zionists." 10 This in itself was flatly-contradicted by the British
statesman, Herbert Morrison, who on returning from a visit to Palestine and
Trans-Jordan in 1936, told the House that Jews were being kept out of Transjordan
"by the wish of the British Government. ,, 11
The fact is that Trans-Jordan is a colony
which Great Britain
got on the excuse that it was to be part of the Jewish Homeland. The Commander of the Arab Legion is a
blue-eyed Englishman named Peake Pasha. The most prominent agent of the
all-important British Intelligence Service, Major J. B. Glubb, is stationed
there permanently in charge of the desert patrol which keeps the turbulent
tribesmen under control. Here in itself is proof of the importance London attaches to ownership of this area.
British officials rule as in any other colony, and the word of the British High
Commissioner is final. Says the Encyclopedia Britannica: "A considerable
increase in the number of British officials and the transfer of the Palestine gendarmerie en bloc to Trans-Jordan
resulted in fact in the carrying on of the Administration on Crown Colony
lines; and the local Government existing as a façade, exercised little or no
independent authority." 12
Read the full article in the link below.
(excerpt
from – The Rape of Palestine by William Ziff)
The 'treaty'
between Great Britain and Abdullah covers all of this nicely.
"His Highness the Emir agrees to be guided by the advice of His Britannic
Majesty in all matters concerning the granting of concessions, the exploitation
of natural resources, the construction and operation of railways, and the
operation of loans." The Emir may not "raise or maintain in Trans-Jordan
or allow be raising or maintaining, any military forces without the consent of
His Britannic Majesty." The 'independent
Emirate' agrees
"to the employment of British officials." England may keep a foreign army on its soil, and
has its power of attorney in all matters of international relationship. Laws affecting
the State budget, currency, land grants, succession to the throne and changes in
the 'Constitution' are to be referred to the advice of Great Britain . Signed March 20, 1928, this 'treaty*
completed the Strategical moves by which Transjordan was to be purloined from
the Jewish National Home and stuffed in the pocket of Great Britain. Today the
Emir Abdullah is a dummy who sits on the knee of a ventriloquist known as the
British Resident. It is Abdullah's lips which move, but it is the voice of Downing Street which comes forth.
Calling a spade a
spade, the London Times, in its issue of March 29, 1928 , declares: "Transjordan therefore has the status equivalent to a
protectorate, the only difference being the status of Great Britain , because whereas a Mandate is provisional,
the present relationship is permanent"
(excerpt from –
The Rape of Palestine by William Ziff)
To further compound this the Jews never had
a chance of reaching a majority because of the restrictive immigration policy
of the British. By contrast, Palestine’s Arab population, which had been
declining prior to the Mandate in 1922, grew exponentially as hundreds of
thousands of Arabs from all the surrounding countries flocked into the land to
advantage of the rapid economic development created by Zionist enterprise.
A Memorandum to
the Protestant Monarchs of Europe
on the Subject of the Restoration of the Jewish People to the Land
of Palestine
- Israel ." From this date onward's a pro-Jewish
Palestinian discussion ran parallel in the London Times with the agitation over
the Eastern question.
Comments
Post a Comment